Playoff Bracket · Football Division 6 UNOFFICIAL

Ewert projection through week 3Ewert’s picks: week 9 ratings, 10/20/26, 11:54 PM CentralField table · How it works

Bracket and table computed Wed, Oct 21 · 3:51 PM CDT

Division 6 · Week 3 field and cut line

The table uses reported results through Week 3. Projected Final shows our latest forecast, based on reported Week 9 results plus the remaining ES picks; arrows compare it with this table. This is today’s forecast, not a saved forecast from Week 3. UNOFFICIAL · partial: unresolved games or opponent data can change these placements.

Since week 2: in Saint Mary Catholic (34 → 11), Southern Door (38 → 26), Benton (34 → 31) · out Fall River/Rio (27 → 34), Howards Grove (27 → 34), Oconto (27 → 34). Biggest climbs: Saint Mary Catholic ▲23, Weyauwega-Fremont ▲15, Southern Door ▲12. Biggest drops: Colby ▼14, Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic ▼10, Lomira ▼9.

No future qualifying games remain. This is a comparison of the current qualifying results, not a new forecast; unresolved results or opponent data still affect the comparison.

Rank	+/−	Team	City	W-L	Total	Tier 1 AVG	Tier 2 AVG	Tier 2 Wins	Projected Seed	Projected Final Seed Rank · Seed · Partial
1	▲3	Randolph/Cambria-Friesland check		Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20Catholic Central/Ken Ch LifeW (Seeding Only) Aug 20Catholic CentralW (forfeit)Not counted: Not counted: this forfeit win was replaced by the more favorable win on 2026-08-20 (regulations 3h). Aug 28HilbertW Sep 4Fall River/RioW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	23.83	Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20Catholic Central/Ken Ch LifeW (Seeding Only)4.00 Aug 28HilbertW3.50 Sep 4Fall River/RioW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 3 = 3.833 Full worked example	Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20Catholic Central/Ken Ch LifeW (Seeding Only)8.00 · 3 Aug 28HilbertW8.00 · 3 Sep 4Fall River/RioW4.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 20.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 2.222 Full worked example	Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 20Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life2 Aug 28Hilbert2 Sep 4Fall River/Rio1 Tier 2 Wins = 5 Full worked example	1-C	15 ▼14 · 4-D
2	▼1	Bonduel check	Bonduel	Bonduel · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW Aug 27ColemanW Sep 4KewauneeW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	23.00	Bonduel · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW4.50 Aug 27ColemanW3.50 Sep 4KewauneeW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 3 = 4.000 Full worked example	Bonduel · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW4.50 · 3 Aug 27ColemanW9.00 · 3 Sep 4KewauneeW5.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 19.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 2.111 Full worked example	Bonduel · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Wittenberg-Birnamwood1 Aug 27Coleman2 Sep 4Kewaunee1 Tier 2 Wins = 4 Full worked example	1-A	2 – · 1-A
3	▲4	Mondovi check	Mondovi	Mondovi · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW Aug 28OsceolaW Sep 4Fall CreekW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	23.00	Mondovi · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW4.50 Aug 28OsceolaW5.00 Sep 4Fall CreekW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 13.50 ÷ 3 = 4.500 Full worked example	Mondovi · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW0.00 · 3 Aug 28OsceolaW9.50 · 3 Sep 4Fall CreekW9.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 18.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 2.056 Full worked example	Mondovi · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Gale-Ettrick-Trempealeau0 Aug 28Osceola2 Sep 4Fall Creek2 Tier 2 Wins = 4 Full worked example	1-B	1 ▲2 · 1-C
4	▼1	Manitowoc Lutheran check	Manitowoc	Manitowoc Lutheran · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21RoncalliW Aug 27BrillionW Sep 3Cedar Grove-BelgiumW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	20.50	Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21RoncalliW3.50 Aug 27BrillionW4.50 Sep 3Cedar Grove-BelgiumW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 3 = 4.000 Full worked example	Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21RoncalliW4.00 · 3 Aug 27BrillionW8.50 · 3 Sep 3Cedar Grove-BelgiumW4.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 16.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.833 Full worked example	Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Roncalli1 Aug 27Brillion2 Sep 3Cedar Grove-Belgium1 Tier 2 Wins = 4 Full worked example	1-D	4 – · 1-D
5	▲15	Weyauwega-Fremont check	Weyauwega	Weyauwega-Fremont · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21BerlinW Aug 28Iola-ScandinaviaW (forfeit)Not counted: Not counted: this forfeit win was replaced by the more favorable win on 2026-08-28 (regulations 3h). Aug 28Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only) Sep 4Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	17.17	Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21BerlinW5.00 Aug 28Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only)4.50 Sep 4Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 14.00 ÷ 3 = 4.667 Full worked example	Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21BerlinW4.50 · 3 Aug 28Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only)3.50 · 3 Sep 4Wittenberg-BirnamwoodW4.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 12.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.389 Full worked example	Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Berlin1 Aug 28Kingdom Prep Lutheran1 Sep 4Wittenberg-Birnamwood1 Tier 2 Wins = 3 Full worked example	2-A	18 ▼13 · 5-D
6	▼4	Poynette check	Poynette	Poynette · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Fall River/RioW Aug 28WautomaW Sep 4WaterlooW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	17.00	Poynette · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Fall River/RioW4.00 Aug 28WautomaW4.50 Sep 4WaterlooW3.50 Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 3 = 4.000 Full worked example	Poynette · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Fall River/RioW4.00 · 3 Aug 28WautomaW4.50 · 3 Sep 4WaterlooW4.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 13.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.444 Full worked example	Poynette · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Fall River/Rio1 Aug 28Wautoma1 Sep 4Waterloo1 Tier 2 Wins = 3 Full worked example	2-C	28 ▼22 · 7-C
7	▼1	Mineral Point check	Mineral Point	Mineral Point · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21DodgevilleW Aug 28PlattevilleW Sep 4DarlingtonL Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	16.67	Mineral Point · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21DodgevilleW4.50 Aug 28PlattevilleW5.00 Sep 4DarlingtonL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 9.50 ÷ 3 = 3.167 Full worked example	Mineral Point · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21DodgevilleW4.50 · 3 Aug 28PlattevilleW9.00 · 3 Sep 4DarlingtonL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 13.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.500 Full worked example	Mineral Point · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Dodgeville1 Aug 28Platteville2 Tier 2 Wins = 3 Full worked example	2-B	13 ▼6 · 4-C
8	▲6	Saint Mary's Springs check	Fond du Lac	Saint Mary's Springs · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 22DarlingtonL Aug 29Racine St. Catherine'sW Sep 4LaconiaW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	16.50	Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 22DarlingtonL0.00 Aug 29Racine St. Catherine'sW5.00 Sep 4LaconiaW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 9.00 ÷ 3 = 3.000 Full worked example	Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 22DarlingtonL— · 3 Aug 29Racine St. Catherine'sW9.50 · 3 Sep 4LaconiaW4.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 13.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.500 Full worked example	Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 29Racine St. Catherine's2 Sep 4Laconia1 Tier 2 Wins = 3 Full worked example	2-D	19 ▼11 · 5-B
9	▲7	Potosi/Cassville check		Potosi/Cassville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Cuba CityL Aug 28Richland CenterW Sep 4River RidgeW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	14.67	Potosi/Cassville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Cuba CityL0.00 Aug 28Richland CenterW4.50 Sep 4River RidgeW3.50 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Potosi/Cassville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Cuba CityL— · 3 Aug 28Richland CenterW4.50 · 3 Sep 4River RidgeW7.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 12.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.333 Full worked example	Potosi/Cassville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Richland Center1 Sep 4River Ridge2 Tier 2 Wins = 3 Full worked example	3-B	17 ▼8 · 5-C
10	▼2	Regis check	Eau Claire	Regis · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21McDonell Central CatholicW Aug 28AltoonaW Sep 4AbbotsfordW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	12.50	Regis · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21McDonell Central CatholicW3.50 Aug 28AltoonaW5.00 Sep 4AbbotsfordW3.50 Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 3 = 4.000 Full worked example	Regis · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21McDonell Central CatholicW4.50 · 3 Aug 28AltoonaW0.00 · 3 Sep 4AbbotsfordW4.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.944 Full worked example	Regis · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21McDonell Central Catholic1 Aug 28Altoona0 Sep 4Abbotsford1 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	3-C	11 ▼1 · 3-A
11	▲23	Saint Mary Catholic check	Neenah	Saint Mary Catholic · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21HilbertL Aug 27ManawaW Sep 4Two RiversW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	12.33	Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21HilbertL0.00 Aug 27ManawaW3.50 Sep 4Two RiversW5.00 Tier 1 AVG = 8.50 ÷ 3 = 2.833 Full worked example	Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21HilbertL— · 3 Aug 27ManawaW4.50 · 3 Sep 4Two RiversW5.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 9.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.056 Full worked example	Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 27Manawa1 Sep 4Two Rivers1 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	3-A in	7 ▲4 · 2-A
12	▼2	Kewaunee check	Kewaunee	Kewaunee · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Fox Valley LutheranL Aug 28Luxemburg-CascoW Sep 4BonduelL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	11.83	Kewaunee · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Fox Valley LutheranL0.00 Aug 28Luxemburg-CascoW5.50 Sep 4BonduelL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 5.50 ÷ 3 = 1.833 Full worked example	Kewaunee · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Fox Valley LutheranL— · 3 Aug 28Luxemburg-CascoW10.00 · 3 Sep 4BonduelL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 10.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.111 Full worked example	Kewaunee · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Luxemburg-Casco2 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	3-D	8 ▲4 · 2-D
13	▼2	Fennimore check	Fennimore	Fennimore · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Iowa-GrantW Aug 28BoscobelW Sep 4River ValleyW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	11.83	Fennimore · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Iowa-GrantW3.50 Aug 28BoscobelW3.50 Sep 4River ValleyW4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 3 = 3.833 Full worked example	Fennimore · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Iowa-GrantW8.00 · 3 Aug 28BoscobelW0.00 · 3 Sep 4River ValleyW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.889 Full worked example	Fennimore · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Iowa-Grant2 Aug 28Boscobel0 Sep 4River Valley0 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	4-B	36 ▼23 · Out projected out
14	▼9	Lomira check	Lomira	Lomira · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Horicon/HustisfordW Aug 28Milwaukee KingW Sep 4CampbellsportW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	11.50	Lomira · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Horicon/HustisfordW4.00 Aug 28Milwaukee KingW6.00 Sep 4CampbellsportW5.00 Tier 1 AVG = 15.00 ÷ 3 = 5.000 Full worked example	Lomira · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Horicon/HustisfordW0.00 · 3 Aug 28Milwaukee KingW6.50 · 3 Sep 4CampbellsportW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 6.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.722 Full worked example	Lomira · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Horicon/Hustisford0 Aug 28Milwaukee King1 Sep 4Campbellsport0 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	4-D	5 ▲9 · 2-B
15	▲6	Pardeeville check	Pardeeville	Pardeeville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21East TroyW Aug 28Adams-FriendshipW Sep 4MarshallW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	11.33	Pardeeville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21East TroyW4.50 Aug 28Adams-FriendshipW4.50 Sep 4MarshallW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 13.00 ÷ 3 = 4.333 Full worked example	Pardeeville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21East TroyW0.00 · 3 Aug 28Adams-FriendshipW0.00 · 3 Sep 4MarshallW7.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 7.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.778 Full worked example	Pardeeville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21East Troy0 Aug 28Adams-Friendship0 Sep 4Marshall2 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	4-A	16 ▼1 · 4-A
16	▼7	Cuba City check	Cuba City	Cuba City · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Potosi/CassvilleW Aug 28LancasterW Sep 4New GlarusL Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	10.67	Cuba City · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Potosi/CassvilleW4.00 Aug 28LancasterW4.00 Sep 4New GlarusL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Cuba City · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Potosi/CassvilleW8.00 · 3 Aug 28LancasterW0.00 · 3 Sep 4New GlarusL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.889 Full worked example	Cuba City · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Potosi/Cassville2 Aug 28Lancaster0 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	4-C	12 ▲4 · 3-C
17	▼5	Cedar Grove-Belgium check	Cedar Grove	Cedar Grove-Belgium · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21MayvilleL Aug 28Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicW Sep 3Manitowoc LutheranL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	10.33	Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21MayvilleL0.00 Aug 28Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicW4.00 Sep 3Manitowoc LutheranL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21MayvilleL— · 3 Aug 28Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicW9.00 · 3 Sep 3Manitowoc LutheranL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 9.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 1.000 Full worked example	Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic2 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	5-D	10 ▲7 · 3-D
18	▲1	Edgar check	Edgar	Edgar · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21CadottW Aug 28StratfordL Sep 4PittsvilleW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	10.33	Edgar · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21CadottW3.50 Aug 28StratfordL0.00 Sep 4PittsvilleW3.50 Tier 1 AVG = 7.00 ÷ 3 = 2.333 Full worked example	Edgar · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21CadottW8.00 · 3 Aug 28StratfordL— · 3 Sep 4PittsvilleW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.889 Full worked example	Edgar · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Cadott2 Sep 4Pittsville0 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	5-A	3 ▲15 · 1-B
19T	▼2	Marshall check	Marshall	Marshall · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20Johnson CreekW Aug 28DeerfieldW Sep 4PardeevilleL Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	9.33	Marshall · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20Johnson CreekW3.50 Aug 28DeerfieldW3.50 Sep 4PardeevilleL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 7.00 ÷ 3 = 2.333 Full worked example	Marshall · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20Johnson CreekW3.50 · 3 Aug 28DeerfieldW3.50 · 3 Sep 4PardeevilleL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 7.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.778 Full worked example	Marshall · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 20Johnson Creek1 Aug 28Deerfield1 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	5-C	37 ▼18 · Out projected out
19T	▼1	Chetek-Weyerhaeuser check	Chetek	Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21CumberlandW Aug 28Spring ValleyL Sep 4WebsterL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	9.33	Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21CumberlandW4.00 Aug 28Spring ValleyL0.00 Sep 4WebsterL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21CumberlandW8.00 · 3 Aug 28Spring ValleyL— · 3 Sep 4WebsterL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.889 Full worked example	Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Cumberland2 Tier 2 Wins = 2 Full worked example	5-B	45 ▼26 · Out projected out
21	▲2	Marathon check	Marathon	Marathon · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Loyal/GreenwoodW Aug 28AuburndaleW Sep 3CrandonW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	7.83	Marathon · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Loyal/GreenwoodW4.00 Aug 28AuburndaleW4.00 Sep 3CrandonW3.50 Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 3 = 3.833 Full worked example	Marathon · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Loyal/GreenwoodW4.00 · 3 Aug 28AuburndaleW0.00 · 3 Sep 3CrandonW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.444 Full worked example	Marathon · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Loyal/Greenwood1 Aug 28Auburndale0 Sep 3Crandon0 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	6-A	22 ▼1 · 6-A
22	▲5	Belleville check	Belleville	Belleville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21LancasterW Aug 28New GlarusL Sep 4CambridgeW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	7.67	Belleville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21LancasterW4.00 Aug 28New GlarusL0.00 Sep 4CambridgeW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Belleville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21LancasterW0.00 · 3 Aug 28New GlarusL— · 3 Sep 4CambridgeW5.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 5.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.556 Full worked example	Belleville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Lancaster0 Sep 4Cambridge1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	6-B	14 ▲8 · 4-B
23	–	Luther check	Onalaska	Luther · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21TomahawkW Aug 28BangorW Sep 4Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW Counted: 3-0 Full worked example	7.67	Luther · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21TomahawkW4.50 Aug 28BangorW3.50 Sep 4Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 12.50 ÷ 3 = 4.167 Full worked example	Luther · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21TomahawkW0.00 · 3 Aug 28BangorW3.50 · 3 Sep 4Gale-Ettrick-TrempealeauW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 3.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.389 Full worked example	Luther · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Tomahawk0 Aug 28Bangor1 Sep 4Gale-Ettrick-Trempealeau0 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	6-C	21 ▲2 · 6-B
24	▼10	Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic check	Kenosha	Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20Shoreland LutheranW Aug 28Cedar Grove-BelgiumL Sep 4Living Word LutheranW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	7.50	Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20Shoreland LutheranW5.00 Aug 28Cedar Grove-BelgiumL0.00 Sep 4Living Word LutheranW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 9.00 ÷ 3 = 3.000 Full worked example	Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20Shoreland LutheranW4.50 · 3 Aug 28Cedar Grove-BelgiumL— · 3 Sep 4Living Word LutheranW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.500 Full worked example	Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 20Shoreland Lutheran1 Sep 4Living Word Lutheran0 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	6-D	6 ▲18 · 2-C
25	▲1	Prairie du Chien check	Prairie du Chien	Prairie du Chien · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21AquinasL Aug 28PrescottW Sep 4Richland CenterW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	7.50	Prairie du Chien · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21AquinasL0.00 Aug 28PrescottW4.50 Sep 4Richland CenterW4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 9.00 ÷ 3 = 3.000 Full worked example	Prairie du Chien · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21AquinasL— · 3 Aug 28PrescottW0.00 · 3 Sep 4Richland CenterW4.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.500 Full worked example	Prairie du Chien · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Prescott0 Sep 4Richland Center1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	7-B	30 ▼5 · 8-B
26	▲12	Southern Door check	Brussels	Southern Door · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21New HolsteinL Aug 28ShioctonL Sep 4MarinetteW Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	6.67	Southern Door · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21New HolsteinL0.00 Aug 28ShioctonL0.00 Sep 4MarinetteW5.00 Tier 1 AVG = 5.00 ÷ 3 = 1.667 Full worked example	Southern Door · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21New HolsteinL— · 3 Aug 28ShioctonL— · 3 Sep 4MarinetteW5.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 5.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.556 Full worked example	Southern Door · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Sep 4Marinette1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	7-D in	40 ▼14 · Out projected out
27	▼14	Colby check	Colby	Colby · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Stanley-BoydW Aug 28AbbotsfordW Sep 4AmherstL Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	6.50	Colby · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Stanley-BoydW4.00 Aug 28AbbotsfordW3.50 Sep 4AmherstL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 7.50 ÷ 3 = 2.500 Full worked example	Colby · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Stanley-BoydW0.00 · 3 Aug 28AbbotsfordW4.00 · 3 Sep 4AmherstL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.444 Full worked example	Colby · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Stanley-Boyd0 Aug 28Abbotsford1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	7-A	33 ▼6 · Out projected out
28	▼3	Cambridge check	Cambridge	Cambridge · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21New GlarusL Aug 28MaustonW Sep 4BellevilleL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	5.67	Cambridge · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21New GlarusL0.00 Aug 28MaustonW5.00 Sep 4BellevilleL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 5.00 ÷ 3 = 1.667 Full worked example	Cambridge · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21New GlarusL— · 3 Aug 28MaustonW4.00 · 3 Sep 4BellevilleL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.444 Full worked example	Cambridge · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Mauston1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	7-C	9 ▲19 · 3-B
29	▼2	Laconia check	Rosendale	Laconia · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20RiponL Aug 28MarkesanW Sep 4Saint Mary's SpringsL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	5.33	Laconia · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20RiponL0.00 Aug 28MarkesanW4.00 Sep 4Saint Mary's SpringsL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Laconia · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20RiponL— · 3 Aug 28MarkesanW4.00 · 3 Sep 4Saint Mary's SpringsL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.444 Full worked example	Laconia · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Markesan1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	8-C	38 ▼9 · Out projected out
30	▼9	Fall Creek check	Fall Creek	Fall Creek · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21AltoonaW Aug 28BarronW Sep 4MondoviL Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	3.00	Fall Creek · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21AltoonaW5.00 Aug 28BarronW4.00 Sep 4MondoviL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 9.00 ÷ 3 = 3.000 Full worked example	Fall Creek · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21AltoonaW0.00 · 3 Aug 28BarronW0.00 · 3 Sep 4MondoviL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Fall Creek · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Altoona0 Aug 28Barron0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	8-B	27 ▲3 · 7-A
31T	▲3	Benton check	Benton	Benton · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21River RidgeL Aug 28Dakota, ILW Sep 4Southwestern/East Dubuque (IL)W Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	2.67	Benton · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21River RidgeL0.00 Aug 28Dakota, ILW3.50 Sep 4Southwestern/East Dubuque (IL)W4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Benton · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21River RidgeL— · 3 Aug 28Dakota, ILW0.00 · 1 Sep 4Southwestern/East Dubuque (IL)W0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 7 = 0.000 Full worked example	Benton · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Dakota, IL0 Sep 4Southwestern/East Dubuque (IL)0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	#8 in	24 ▲7 · 6-C
31T	▼4	Cameron check	Cameron	Cameron · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21BarronW Aug 28BoycevilleL Sep 4LadysmithW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	2.67	Cameron · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21BarronW4.00 Aug 28BoycevilleL0.00 Sep 4LadysmithW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Cameron · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21BarronW0.00 · 3 Aug 28BoycevilleL— · 3 Sep 4LadysmithW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Cameron · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Barron0 Sep 4Ladysmith0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	#8	44 ▼13 · Out projected out
31T	▼4	Cumberland check	Cumberland	Cumberland · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Chetek-WeyerhaeuserL Aug 27LadysmithW Sep 4BarronW Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	2.67	Cumberland · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Chetek-WeyerhaeuserL0.00 Aug 27LadysmithW4.00 Sep 4BarronW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Cumberland · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Chetek-WeyerhaeuserL— · 3 Aug 27LadysmithW0.00 · 3 Sep 4BarronW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Cumberland · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 27Ladysmith0 Sep 4Barron0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	#8	47 ▼16 · Out projected out
Cut line · the top 32 qualify
34T	▼7	Fall River/Rio checkBelow cut line		Fall River/Rio · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21PoynetteL Aug 28Horicon/HustisfordW Sep 4Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.33	Fall River/Rio · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21PoynetteL0.00 Aug 28Horicon/HustisfordW4.00 Sep 4Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Fall River/Rio · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21PoynetteL— · 3 Aug 28Horicon/HustisfordW0.00 · 3 Sep 4Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Fall River/Rio · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Horicon/Hustisford0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line dropped	25 ▲9 · 7-B projected in
34T	▼7	Howards Grove checkBelow cut line	Howards Grove	Howards Grove · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21ValdersW Aug 28Pius XI CatholicL Sep 4HilbertL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.33	Howards Grove · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21ValdersW4.00 Aug 28Pius XI CatholicL0.00 Sep 4HilbertL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Howards Grove · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21ValdersW0.00 · 2 Aug 28Pius XI CatholicL— · 3 Sep 4HilbertL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 8 = 0.000 Full worked example	Howards Grove · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Valders0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line dropped	43 ▼9 · Out
34T	▲4	Loyal/Greenwood checkBelow cut line		Loyal/Greenwood · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21MarathonL Aug 28Neillsville/GrantonL Sep 4AuburndaleW Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.33	Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21MarathonL0.00 Aug 28Neillsville/GrantonL0.00 Sep 4AuburndaleW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21MarathonL— · 3 Aug 28Neillsville/GrantonL— · 3 Sep 4AuburndaleW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Sep 4Auburndale0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	26 ▲8 · 7-D projected in
34T	▲4	Markesan checkBelow cut line	Markesan	Markesan · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21AbbotsfordL Aug 28LaconiaL Sep 3Horicon/HustisfordW Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.33	Markesan · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21AbbotsfordL0.00 Aug 28LaconiaL0.00 Sep 3Horicon/HustisfordW4.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Markesan · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21AbbotsfordL— · 3 Aug 28LaconiaL— · 3 Sep 3Horicon/HustisfordW0.00 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Markesan · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Sep 3Horicon/Hustisford0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	34 – · Out
34T	▼7	Oconto checkBelow cut line	Oconto	Oconto · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20MishicotW Aug 27ChiltonL Sep 4Oconto FallsL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.33	Oconto · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20MishicotW4.00 Aug 27ChiltonL0.00 Sep 4Oconto FallsL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 3 = 1.333 Full worked example	Oconto · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20MishicotW0.00 · 3 Aug 27ChiltonL— · 3 Sep 4Oconto FallsL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Oconto · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 20Mishicot0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line dropped	35 ▼1 · Out
39T	▼5	Nekoosa checkBelow cut line	Nekoosa	Nekoosa · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21CrandonW Aug 28WestfieldL Sep 4MaustonL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.17	Nekoosa · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21CrandonW3.50 Aug 28WestfieldL0.00 Sep 4MaustonL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 3.50 ÷ 3 = 1.167 Full worked example	Nekoosa · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21CrandonW0.00 · 3 Aug 28WestfieldL— · 3 Sep 4MaustonL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Nekoosa · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 21Crandon0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	20 ▲19 · 5-A projected in
39T	▼5	Westby checkBelow cut line	Westby	Westby · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21RoyallL Aug 28DodgelandW Sep 4Black River FallsL Counted: 1-2 Full worked example	1.17	Westby · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21RoyallL0.00 Aug 28DodgelandW3.50 Sep 4Black River FallsL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 3.50 ÷ 3 = 1.167 Full worked example	Westby · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21RoyallL— · 3 Aug 28DodgelandW0.00 · 3 Sep 4Black River FallsL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Westby · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Dodgeland0 Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	49 ▼10 · Out
41T	▼3	Auburndale checkBelow cut line	Auburndale	Auburndale · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Spencer/Columbus CatholicL Aug 28MarathonL Sep 4Loyal/GreenwoodL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Auburndale · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Spencer/Columbus CatholicL0.00 Aug 28MarathonL0.00 Sep 4Loyal/GreenwoodL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Auburndale · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Spencer/Columbus CatholicL— · 3 Aug 28MarathonL— · 3 Sep 4Loyal/GreenwoodL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Auburndale · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	41 – · Out
41T	▼3	Barron checkBelow cut line	Barron	Barron · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21CameronL Aug 28Fall CreekL Sep 4CumberlandL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Barron · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21CameronL0.00 Aug 28Fall CreekL0.00 Sep 4CumberlandL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Barron · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21CameronL— · 3 Aug 28Fall CreekL— · 3 Sep 4CumberlandL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Barron · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	48 ▼7 · Out
41T	▼3	Clinton checkBelow cut line	Clinton	Clinton · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Wilmot UnionL Aug 28Woodstock, ILL Sep 4Big FootL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Clinton · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Wilmot UnionL0.00 Aug 28Woodstock, ILL0.00 Sep 4Big FootL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Clinton · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Wilmot UnionL— · 3 Aug 28Woodstock, ILL— · 1 Sep 4Big FootL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 7 = 0.000 Full worked example	Clinton · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	42 ▼1 · Out
41T	▼3	Horicon/Hustisford checkBelow cut line		Horicon/Hustisford · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21LomiraL Aug 28Fall River/RioL Sep 3MarkesanL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21LomiraL0.00 Aug 28Fall River/RioL0.00 Sep 3MarkesanL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21LomiraL— · 3 Aug 28Fall River/RioL— · 3 Sep 3MarkesanL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	46 ▼5 · Out
41T	▼3	Ladysmith checkBelow cut line	Ladysmith	Ladysmith · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20BoycevilleL Aug 27CumberlandL Sep 4CameronL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Ladysmith · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20BoycevilleL0.00 Aug 27CumberlandL0.00 Sep 4CameronL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Ladysmith · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20BoycevilleL— · 3 Aug 27CumberlandL— · 3 Sep 4CameronL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Ladysmith · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	50T ▼9 · Out
41T	▼3	Lancaster checkBelow cut line	Lancaster	Lancaster · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21BellevilleL Aug 28Cuba CityL Sep 4PlattevilleL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Lancaster · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21BellevilleL0.00 Aug 28Cuba CityL0.00 Sep 4PlattevilleL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Lancaster · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21BellevilleL— · 3 Aug 28Cuba CityL— · 3 Sep 4PlattevilleL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Lancaster · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	31 ▲10 · 8-A projected in
41T	▼3	Living Word Lutheran checkBelow cut line	Jackson	Living Word Lutheran · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20Lourdes AcademyL Aug 28Ozaukee/Random LakeL Sep 4Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Living Word Lutheran · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20Lourdes AcademyL0.00 Aug 28Ozaukee/Random LakeL0.00 Sep 4Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Living Word Lutheran · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20Lourdes AcademyL— · 3 Aug 28Ozaukee/Random LakeL— · 3 Sep 4Kenosha St. Joseph CatholicL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Living Word Lutheran · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	32 ▲9 · 8-D projected in
41T	▼3	Mishicot checkBelow cut line	Mishicot	Mishicot · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20OcontoL Aug 28RoncalliL Sep 4ReedsvilleL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Mishicot · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20OcontoL0.00 Aug 28RoncalliL0.00 Sep 4ReedsvilleL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Mishicot · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20OcontoL— · 3 Aug 28RoncalliL— · 3 Sep 4ReedsvilleL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Mishicot · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	50T ▼9 · Out
41T	▼3	Stanley-Boyd checkBelow cut line	Stanley	Stanley-Boyd · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21ColbyL Aug 28CadottL Sep 4Durand-ArkansawL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Stanley-Boyd · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21ColbyL0.00 Aug 28CadottL0.00 Sep 4Durand-ArkansawL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Stanley-Boyd · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21ColbyL— · 3 Aug 28CadottL— · 3 Sep 4Durand-ArkansawL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Stanley-Boyd · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	39 ▲2 · Out
41T	▼3	Unity checkBelow cut line	Balsam Lake	Unity · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Saint Croix FallsL Aug 27AmeryL Sep 4CadottL Counted: 0-3 Full worked example	0.00	Unity · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Saint Croix FallsL0.00 Aug 27AmeryL0.00 Sep 4CadottL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 3 = 0.000 Full worked example	Unity · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Saint Croix FallsL— · 3 Aug 27AmeryL— · 3 Sep 4CadottL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.000 Full worked example	Unity · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	29 ▲12 · 8-C projected in
41T	▼3	Valders checkBelow cut line	Valders	Valders · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 21Howards GroveL Sep 4BrillionL Counted: 0-2 Full worked example	0.00	Valders · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 21Howards GroveL0.00 Sep 4BrillionL0.00 Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 2 = 0.000 Full worked example	Valders · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 21Howards GroveL— · 3 Sep 4BrillionL— · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 6 = 0.000 Full worked example	Valders · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 Full worked example	Below cut line	23 ▲18 · 6-D projected in
—		Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life check	Burlington	Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result Aug 20Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL (Seeding Only) Aug 28Johnson CreekW (Seeding Only) Sep 3Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only) Counted: 2-1 Full worked example	9.17	Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned Aug 20Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL (Seeding Only)0.00 Aug 28Johnson CreekW (Seeding Only)3.50 Sep 3Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only)4.50 Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 3 = 2.667 Full worked example	Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games Aug 20Randolph/Cambria-FrieslandL (Seeding Only)— · 3 Aug 28Johnson CreekW (Seeding Only)0.00 · 3 Sep 3Kingdom Prep LutheranW (Seeding Only)6.50 · 3 Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 6.50 ÷ opponents’ games 9 = 0.722 Full worked example	Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins Aug 28Johnson Creek0 Sep 3Kingdom Prep Lutheran1 Tier 2 Wins = 1 Full worked example	Excluded	Excluded
—		Northwood/Solon Springs checkProgram eligibility not verified		0-0	—	—	—	—	Unverified	Unverified
—		Winter/Birchwood checkProgram eligibility not verified		0-0	—	—	—	—	Unverified	Unverified

Ewert’s picks are guesses. Hypothetical playoff winners use the current ES model and rated snapshots, not seeds. Early rounds assume the higher seed hosts; state semifinals and final assume a neutral site. No new games, results or forecasts are saved. ES basis: week 9, 10/20/26, 11:54 PM Central. Missing or near-even inputs remain TBD.

Wisconsin programs continue below the cut line in the same table. Eligibility notes use the published WIAA record; where it does not identify the reason, we say so. A three-year enrollment average above 200 can have a second-year commitment exception.

About this projection

Unofficial projection. Seeds come from the unofficial playoff matrix above (WIAA’s formula on the results we hold, 2026 regulations). Regions and Level 1 pairings follow the regulations’ travel rules with an approximation: straight-line miles between school ZIP centroids instead of WIAA’s travel distances, so a region letter or a pairing near the margin can differ. Slots: projected from the unofficial matrix; not WIAA's published bracket. Through week 3 (games through Saturday 2026-09-05). 33 of 51 in the field, 30 placed (3 waiting on a tie-break).

How WIAA builds the bracket, and how to check a team

Tier 1 points. Every win earns points set by the team you beat: Division 1 = 6.5, D2 = 6.0, D3 = 5.5, D4 = 5.0, D5 = 4.5, D6 = 4.0, D7 = 3.5. A tie earns half. A loss earns nothing. A forfeit win earns the full value. Tier 1 AVG = Tier 1 points ÷ games played (at most 9).
Tier 2 points. Add up their Tier 1 points for every team you beat (a team you tied is not beaten and adds no points). Opponents’ games = the games played by every team you played, won, lost or tied, added together (each counted up to 9). Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points ÷ opponents’ games, and the Tier 2 score is 9 × Tier 2 AVG. WIAA’s rule: “Divide Tier 2 points by opponents’ games played and multiply by 9 (this is a 100% bonus to the Strength of Victory) to get the Tier 2 score.”
Total (PQS) = Tier 1 AVG + 9 × Tier 2 AVG. WIAA’s own example: Franklin 2024, 56.0 ÷ 9 + 228.5 ÷ 81 × 9 = 31.61. Ties in Total are broken by Tier 3, the average of the Tier 2 scores of the teams you beat.
Replacement games. If a team replaced a forfeit win with a new game that week, the forfeit counts when the replacement was lost; when it was won, whichever is worth more counts (regulations 3h). WIAA prints such games as “Seeding Only”. When you beat a team in its replacement game, your Tier 2 points count that team’s Tier 1 points without the forfeit win it kept that week.
Field and seeds. Teams are ranked inside their division by Total. The top 32 qualify after Week 9. Ranks 1–4 are the #1 seeds, 5–8 the #2 seeds, and so on to #8. The four #1 seeds anchor four regions: the #1- and #4-ranked go to one half of the state bracket, #2 and #3 to the other. #2 seeds join the nearest #1 seed, #3 and #4 seeds their likely second-round opponents, and #5–#8 are placed by the shortest total travel. Level 1 is #8 at #1, #5 at #4, #7 at #2 and #6 at #3 in each region.

Worked example: Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic (rank 24, seed 6)

Date	Opponent	Result	Opponent’s value	Tier 1 earned	Opp. Tier 1 points	Opp. games	Counts?
2026-08-20	Shoreland Lutheran	W	5 (D4)	5.00	4.50	3	yes
2026-08-28	Cedar Grove-Belgium	L	4 (D6)	0.00	—	3	yes
2026-09-04	Living Word Lutheran	W	4 (D6)	4.00	0.00	3	yes

Tier 1 AVG = 9.00 ÷ 3 = 3.000. Tier 2 points = 4.50 + 0.00 = 4.50; opponents’ games = 3 + 3 + 3 = 9; Tier 2 AVG = 4.50 ÷ 9 = 0.500. Total = 3.000 + 9 × 0.500 = 7.50 (Tier 3 tie-break 2.25).

To check another team’s numbers, open its row’s “check” link in the tables above. Team labels in the bracket open team pages.