Ewert projection through week 7Ewert’s picks: week 9 ratings, 10/22/26, 5:39 AM CentralField table · How it works
Bracket and table computed Thu, Oct 22 · 6:48 PM CDT
- Final Finished, with the score
- Ewert’s pick A guess, not a set matchup
Division 6 · Week 7 field and cut line
Table-only view →The table uses reported results through Week 7. Projected Final shows our latest forecast, based on reported Week 9 results plus the remaining ES picks; arrows compare it with this table. This is today’s forecast, not a saved forecast from Week 7. UNOFFICIAL · partial: unresolved games or opponent data can change these placements.
Since week 6: in Markesan (38 → 29), Loyal/Greenwood (34 → 31) · out Marshall (29 → 36), Fennimore (31 → 33). Biggest climbs: Cambridge ▲10, Markesan ▲9, Cuba City ▲5. Biggest drops: Benton ▼8, Weyauwega-Fremont ▼6, Poynette ▼6.
No future qualifying games remain. This is a comparison of the current qualifying results, not a new forecast; unresolved results or opponent data still affect the comparison.
| Rank | +/− | Team | City | W-L | Total | Tier 1 AVG | Tier 2 AVG | Tier 2 Wins | Projected Seed | Projected Final Seed Rank · Seed · Partial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Bonduel check | Bonduel | Bonduel · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 7-0 | 24.19 | Bonduel · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 30.50 ÷ 7 = 4.357 | Bonduel · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 108.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 2.204 | Bonduel · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 24 | 1-A | 2 ▼1 · 1-A |
| 2 | – | Manitowoc Lutheran check | Manitowoc | Manitowoc Lutheran · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 7-0 | 23.17 | Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 28.50 ÷ 7 = 4.071 | Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 104.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 2.122 | Manitowoc Lutheran · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 25 | 1-D | 4 ▼2 · 1-D |
| 3 | – | Edgar check | Edgar | Edgar · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 6-1 | 21.85 | Edgar · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 25.00 ÷ 7 = 3.571 | Edgar · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 99.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 2.031 | Edgar · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 23 | 1-C | 3 – · 1-B |
| 4 | ▲4 | Mondovi check | Mondovi | Mondovi · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 6-1 | 19.69 | Mondovi · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 26.00 ÷ 7 = 3.714 | Mondovi · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 87.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.776 | Mondovi · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 20 | 1-B | 1 ▲3 · 1-C |
| 5 | ▲4 | Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic check | Kenosha | Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 6-1 | 19.08 | Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 27.50 ÷ 7 = 3.929 | Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 82.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.684 | Kenosha St. Joseph Catholic · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 18 | 2-A | 6 ▼1 · 2-C |
| 6 | ▼2 | Cedar Grove-Belgium check | Cedar Grove | Cedar Grove-Belgium · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 16.89 | Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 20.50 ÷ 7 = 2.929 | Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 76.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.551 | Cedar Grove-Belgium · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 18 | 2-D | 10 ▼4 · 3-D |
| 7 | ▲3 | Belleville check | Belleville | Belleville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 6-1 | 16.31 | Belleville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 23.50 ÷ 7 = 3.357 | Belleville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 70.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.439 | Belleville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 17 | 2-B | 14 ▼7 · 4-B |
| 8 | ▼2 | Lomira check | Lomira | Lomira · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 7-0 | 16.21 | Lomira · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 32.50 ÷ 7 = 4.643 | Lomira · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 63.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.286 | Lomira · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 13 | 2-C | 5 ▲3 · 2-B |
| 9 | ▼2 | Regis check | Eau Claire | Regis · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 15.97 | Regis · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 20.50 ÷ 7 = 2.929 | Regis · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 71.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.449 | Regis · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 17 | 3-C | 11 ▼2 · 3-A |
| 10 | ▼5 | Randolph/Cambria-Friesland check | Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 7-0 | 15.96 | Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 27.50 ÷ 7 = 3.929 | Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 65.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.337 | Randolph/Cambria-Friesland · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 17 | 3-A | 15 ▼5 · 4-D | |
| 11 | ▲2 | Kewaunee check | Kewaunee | Kewaunee · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 15.57 | Kewaunee · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 23.50 ÷ 7 = 3.357 | Kewaunee · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 66.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.357 | Kewaunee · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 14 | 3-D | 8 ▲3 · 2-D |
| 12 | ▲5 | Cuba City check | Cuba City | Cuba City · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 15.05 | Cuba City · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 20.50 ÷ 7 = 2.929 | Cuba City · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 66.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.347 | Cuba City · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 16 | 3-B | 12 – · 3-C |
| 13 | ▲10 | Cambridge check | Cambridge | Cambridge · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 14.50 | Cambridge · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 20.50 ÷ 7 = 2.929 | Cambridge · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 63.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.286 | Cambridge · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 15 | 4-C | 9 ▲4 · 3-B |
| 14 | ▲1 | Mineral Point check | Mineral Point | Mineral Point · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 14.35 | Mineral Point · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 22.00 ÷ 7 = 3.143 | Mineral Point · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 61.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.245 | Mineral Point · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 14 | 4-B | 13 ▲1 · 4-C |
| 15 | ▼1 | Saint Mary Catholic check | Neenah | Saint Mary Catholic · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 14.34 | Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 21.00 ÷ 7 = 3.000 | Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 60.50 ÷ opponents’ games 48 = 1.260 | Saint Mary Catholic · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 14 | 4-A | 7 ▲8 · 2-A |
| 16 | ▲3 | Saint Mary's Springs check | Fond du Lac | Saint Mary's Springs · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 12.47 | Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 14.00 ÷ 7 = 2.000 | Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 57.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.163 | Saint Mary's Springs · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 12 | 4-D | 19 ▼3 · 5-B |
| 17 | ▼6 | Weyauwega-Fremont check | Weyauwega | Weyauwega-Fremont · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 12.12 | Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 18.00 ÷ 7 = 2.571 | Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 52.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 1.061 | Weyauwega-Fremont · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 12 | 5-A | 18 ▼1 · 5-D |
| 18 | ▼2 | Pardeeville check | Pardeeville | Pardeeville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 6-1 | 11.77 | Pardeeville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 24.50 ÷ 7 = 3.500 | Pardeeville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 45.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.918 | Pardeeville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 11 | 5-C | 16 ▲2 · 4-A |
| 19 | ▲2 | Valders check | Valders | Valders · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-3 | 11.46 | Valders · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 13.50 ÷ 6 = 2.250 | Valders · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 43.00 ÷ opponents’ games 42 = 1.024 | Valders · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 10 | 5-D | 23 ▼4 · 6-D |
| 20 | ▼8 | Benton check | Benton | Benton · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 11.10 | Benton · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 20.50 ÷ 7 = 2.929 | Benton · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 44.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.908 | Benton · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 10 | 5-B | 24 ▼4 · 6-C |
| 21 | ▲5 | Potosi/Cassville check | Potosi/Cassville · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 10.33 | Potosi/Cassville · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 18.50 ÷ 7 = 2.643 | Potosi/Cassville · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 41.00 ÷ opponents’ games 48 = 0.854 | Potosi/Cassville · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 11 | 6-B | 17 ▲4 · 5-C | |
| 22 | ▼2 | Fall River/Rio check | Fall River/Rio · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 10.30 | Fall River/Rio · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 15.50 ÷ 7 = 2.214 | Fall River/Rio · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 44.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.898 | Fall River/Rio · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 12 | 6-D | 25 ▼3 · 7-B | |
| 23 | ▼1 | Luther check | Onalaska | Luther · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 10.16 | Luther · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 21.00 ÷ 7 = 3.000 | Luther · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 39.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.796 | Luther · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 9 | 6-C | 21 ▲2 · 6-B |
| 24 | ▼6 | Poynette check | Poynette | Poynette · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 8.71 | Poynette · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 16.00 ÷ 7 = 2.286 | Poynette · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 35.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.714 | Poynette · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 9 | 6-A | 28 ▼4 · 7-C |
| 25 | – | Marathon check | Marathon | Marathon · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 8.64 | Marathon · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 15.50 ÷ 7 = 2.214 | Marathon · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 35.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.714 | Marathon · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 9 | 7-D | 22 ▲3 · 6-A |
| 26 | ▲1 | Fall Creek check | Fall Creek | Fall Creek · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 7.92 | Fall Creek · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 17.50 ÷ 7 = 2.500 | Fall Creek · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 29.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.602 | Fall Creek · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 7 | 7-B | 27 ▼1 · 7-A |
| 27 | ▲5 | Colby check | Colby | Colby · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 7.59 | Colby · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 16.50 ÷ 7 = 2.357 | Colby · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 28.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.582 | Colby · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 7 | 7-C | 33 ▼6 · Out projected out |
| 28 | ▼4 | Prairie du Chien check | Prairie du Chien | Prairie du Chien · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 5-2 | 7.44 | Prairie du Chien · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 22.50 ÷ 7 = 3.214 | Prairie du Chien · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 23.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.469 | Prairie du Chien · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 5 | 7-A | 30 ▼2 · 8-B |
| 29 | ▲9 | Markesan check | Markesan | Markesan · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 7.32 | Markesan · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 7 = 1.714 | Markesan · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 30.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.622 | Markesan · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 8 | 8-C in | 34 ▼5 · Out projected out |
| 30 | ▼2 | Oconto check | Oconto | Oconto · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 6.91 | Oconto · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 17.50 ÷ 7 = 2.500 | Oconto · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 24.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.490 | Oconto · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 5 | 8-A | 35 ▼5 · Out projected out |
| 31 | ▲3 | Loyal/Greenwood check | Loyal/Greenwood · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 6.60 | Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 7 = 1.643 | Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 27.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.551 | Loyal/Greenwood · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 7 | 8-B in | 26 ▲5 · 7-D | |
| 32 | ▼2 | Living Word Lutheran check | Jackson | Living Word Lutheran · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 6.38 | Living Word Lutheran · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 12.50 ÷ 7 = 1.786 | Living Word Lutheran · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 24.00 ÷ opponents’ games 47 = 0.511 | Living Word Lutheran · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 5 | 8-D | 32 – · 8-D |
| Cut line · the top 32 qualify | ||||||||||
| 33 | ▼2 | Fennimore checkBelow cut line | Fennimore | Fennimore · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 5.13 | Fennimore · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 7 = 1.643 | Fennimore · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 19.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.388 | Fennimore · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 5 | Below cut line dropped | 36 ▼3 · Out |
| 34 | ▼1 | Laconia checkBelow cut line | Rosendale | Laconia · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 5.05 | Laconia · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 13.50 ÷ 7 = 1.929 | Laconia · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 17.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.347 | Laconia · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 4 | Below cut line | 38 ▼4 · Out |
| 35 | ▲1 | Nekoosa checkBelow cut line | Nekoosa | Nekoosa · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 4-3 | 4.98 | Nekoosa · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 17.50 ÷ 7 = 2.500 | Nekoosa · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 13.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.276 | Nekoosa · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 3 | Below cut line | 20 ▲15 · 5-A projected in |
| 36 | ▼7 | Marshall checkBelow cut line | Marshall | Marshall · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 4.90 | Marshall · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 10.50 ÷ 7 = 1.500 | Marshall · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 18.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.378 | Marshall · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 5 | Below cut line dropped | 37 ▼1 · Out |
| 37 | ▲6 | Southern Door checkBelow cut line | Brussels | Southern Door · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 4.02 | Southern Door · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 9.50 ÷ 7 = 1.357 | Southern Door · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 14.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.296 | Southern Door · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 3 | Below cut line | 40 ▼3 · Out |
| 38 | ▲7 | Stanley-Boyd checkBelow cut line | Stanley | Stanley-Boyd · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 3.88 | Stanley-Boyd · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 8.50 ÷ 7 = 1.214 | Stanley-Boyd · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 14.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.296 | Stanley-Boyd · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 4 | Below cut line | 39 ▼1 · Out |
| 39 | – | Howards Grove checkBelow cut line | Howards Grove | Howards Grove · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 3.67 | Howards Grove · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 7 = 1.143 | Howards Grove · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 13.50 ÷ opponents’ games 48 = 0.281 | Howards Grove · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 3 | Below cut line | 43 ▼4 · Out |
| 40 | ▲6 | Auburndale checkBelow cut line | Auburndale | Auburndale · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 3.66 | Auburndale · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 7.00 ÷ 7 = 1.000 | Auburndale · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 14.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.296 | Auburndale · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 4 | Below cut line | 41 ▼1 · Out |
| 41 | ▼6 | Unity checkBelow cut line | Balsam Lake | Unity · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 3.66 | Unity · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 11.50 ÷ 7 = 1.643 | Unity · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 11.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.224 | Unity · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 3 | Below cut line | 29 ▲12 · 8-C projected in |
| 42 | ▼1 | Lancaster checkBelow cut line | Lancaster | Lancaster · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 3.58 | Lancaster · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 13.50 ÷ 7 = 1.929 | Lancaster · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 9.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.184 | Lancaster · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 2 | Below cut line | 31 ▲11 · 8-A projected in |
| 43 | ▼6 | Cameron checkBelow cut line | Cameron | Cameron · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 3-4 | 3.28 | Cameron · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 12.00 ÷ 7 = 1.714 | Cameron · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.173 | Cameron · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 2 | Below cut line | 44 ▼1 · Out |
| 44 | ▲4 | Horicon/Hustisford checkBelow cut line | Horicon/Hustisford · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 1-6 | 2.50 | Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 7 = 0.571 | Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 10.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.214 | Horicon/Hustisford · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 3 | Below cut line | 46 ▼2 · Out | |
| 45 | ▲3 | Clinton checkBelow cut line | Clinton | Clinton · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 1-6 | 2.28 | Clinton · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 5.00 ÷ 7 = 0.714 | Clinton · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.173 | Clinton · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 2 | Below cut line | 42 ▲3 · Out |
| 46 | ▼6 | Chetek-Weyerhaeuser checkBelow cut line | Chetek | Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 1-6 | 2.04 | Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 4.00 ÷ 7 = 0.571 | Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 8.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.163 | Chetek-Weyerhaeuser · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 2 | Below cut line | 45 ▲1 · Out |
| 47 | ▼5 | Cumberland checkBelow cut line | Cumberland | Cumberland · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 1.97 | Cumberland · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 7 = 1.143 | Cumberland · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.50 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.092 | Cumberland · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 1 | Below cut line | 47 – · Out |
| 48 | ▼4 | Barron checkBelow cut line | Barron | Barron · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 1-6 | 1.38 | Barron · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 4.50 ÷ 7 = 0.643 | Barron · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 4.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.082 | Barron · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 1 | Below cut line | 48 – · Out |
| 49 | ▼2 | Westby checkBelow cut line | Westby | Westby · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 1.14 | Westby · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 7 = 1.143 | Westby · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.000 | Westby · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 0 | Below cut line | 49 – · Out |
| 50T | ▼2 | Ladysmith checkBelow cut line | Ladysmith | Ladysmith · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 0-7 | 0.00 | Ladysmith · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 7 = 0.000 | Ladysmith · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.000 | Ladysmith · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 | Below cut line | 50T – · Out |
| 50T | ▼2 | Mishicot checkBelow cut line | Mishicot | Mishicot · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 0-7 | 0.00 | Mishicot · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 0.00 ÷ 7 = 0.000 | Mishicot · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 0.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.000 | Mishicot · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins No games counted yet. Tier 2 Wins = 0 | Below cut line | 50T – · Out |
| — | Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life check | Burlington | Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · W-L by game Date · Opponent · Result
Counted: 2-5 | 4.63 | Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 1 points by game Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 1 earned
Tier 1 AVG = 8.00 ÷ 7 = 1.143 | Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 2 points and opponents’ games Date · Opponent · Result · Tier 2 points · Opponent’s games
Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points 19.00 ÷ opponents’ games 49 = 0.388 | Catholic Central/Ken Ch Life · Tier 2 Wins by game Date · Opponent · Opponent’s wins
Tier 2 Wins = 4 | Excluded | Excluded | |
| — | Northwood/Solon Springs checkProgram eligibility not verified | 0-0 | — | — | — | — | Unverified | Unverified | ||
| — | Winter/Birchwood checkProgram eligibility not verified | 0-0 | — | — | — | — | Unverified | Unverified | ||
Wisconsin programs continue below the cut line in the same table. Eligibility notes use the published WIAA record; where it does not identify the reason, we say so. A three-year enrollment average above 200 can have a second-year commitment exception.
About this projection
WIAA has released its bracket for this field. See the official bracket →
Ewert’s picks are guesses. Hypothetical playoff winners use the current ES model and rated snapshots, not seeds. Early rounds assume the higher seed hosts; state semifinals and final assume a neutral site. No new games, results or forecasts are saved. ES basis: week 9, 10/22/26, 5:39 AM Central. Missing or near-even inputs remain TBD.
Unofficial projection. Seeds come from the unofficial playoff matrix above (WIAA’s formula on the results we hold, 2026 regulations). Regions and Level 1 pairings follow the regulations’ travel rules with an approximation: straight-line miles between school ZIP centroids instead of WIAA’s travel distances, so a region letter or a pairing near the margin can differ. Slots: projected from the unofficial matrix; not WIAA's published bracket. Through week 7 (games through Saturday 2026-10-03). 32 of 51 in the field.
How WIAA builds the bracket, and how to check a team
- Tier 1 points. Every win earns points set by the team you beat: Division 1 = 6.5, D2 = 6.0, D3 = 5.5, D4 = 5.0, D5 = 4.5, D6 = 4.0, D7 = 3.5. A tie earns half. A loss earns nothing. A forfeit win earns the full value. Tier 1 AVG = Tier 1 points ÷ games played (at most 9).
- Tier 2 points. Add up their Tier 1 points for every team you beat (a team you tied is not beaten and adds no points). Opponents’ games = the games played by every team you played, won, lost or tied, added together (each counted up to 9). Tier 2 AVG = Tier 2 points ÷ opponents’ games, and the Tier 2 score is 9 × Tier 2 AVG. WIAA’s rule: “Divide Tier 2 points by opponents’ games played and multiply by 9 (this is a 100% bonus to the Strength of Victory) to get the Tier 2 score.”
- Total (PQS) = Tier 1 AVG + 9 × Tier 2 AVG. WIAA’s own example: Franklin 2024, 56.0 ÷ 9 + 228.5 ÷ 81 × 9 = 31.61. Ties in Total are broken by Tier 3, the average of the Tier 2 scores of the teams you beat.
- Replacement games. If a team replaced a forfeit win with a new game that week, the forfeit counts when the replacement was lost; when it was won, whichever is worth more counts (regulations 3h). WIAA prints such games as “Seeding Only”. When you beat a team in its replacement game, your Tier 2 points count that team’s Tier 1 points without the forfeit win it kept that week.
- Field and seeds. Teams are ranked inside their division by Total. The top 32 qualify after Week 9. Ranks 1–4 are the #1 seeds, 5–8 the #2 seeds, and so on to #8. The four #1 seeds anchor four regions: the #1- and #4-ranked go to one half of the state bracket, #2 and #3 to the other. #2 seeds join the nearest #1 seed, #3 and #4 seeds their likely second-round opponents, and #5–#8 are placed by the shortest total travel. Level 1 is #8 at #1, #5 at #4, #7 at #2 and #6 at #3 in each region.
Worked example: Weyauwega-Fremont (rank 17, seed 5)
| Date | Opponent | Result | Opponent’s value | Tier 1 earned | Opp. Tier 1 points | Opp. games | Counts? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-21 | Berlin | W | 5 (D4) | 5.00 | 18.50 | 7 | yes |
| 2026-08-28 | Iola-Scandinavia | W (forfeit) | 3.5 (D7) | — | — | — | Not counted: this forfeit win was replaced by the more favorable win on 2026-08-28 (regulations 3h). |
| 2026-08-28 | Kingdom Prep Lutheran | W (Seeding Only) | 4.5 (D5) | 4.50 | 9.00 | 7 | yes. Replacement win counted instead of the forfeit win over Iola-Scandinavia that week (more favorable, regulations 3h). Tier 2 credit: Kingdom Prep Lutheran's Tier 1 points less the forfeit win it kept that week (6.5). |
| 2026-09-04 | Wittenberg-Birnamwood | W | 4.5 (D5) | 4.50 | 9.00 | 7 | yes |
| 2026-09-11 | Spencer/Columbus Catholic | L | 4.5 (D5) | 0.00 | — | 7 | yes |
| 2026-09-18 | Stratford | L | 5 (D4) | 0.00 | — | 7 | yes |
| 2026-09-25 | Marathon | W | 4 (D6) | 4.00 | 15.50 | 7 | yes |
| 2026-10-02 | Amherst | L | 4.5 (D5) | 0.00 | — | 7 | yes |
Tier 1 AVG = 18.00 ÷ 7 = 2.571. Tier 2 points = 18.50 + 9.00 + 9.00 + 15.50 = 52.00; opponents’ games = 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = 49; Tier 2 AVG = 52.00 ÷ 49 = 1.061. Total = 2.571 + 9 × 1.061 = 12.12 (Tier 3 tie-break 5.74).
To check another team’s numbers, open its row’s “check” link in the tables above. Confirmed matchups in the bracket open game pages; team pages are linked in the field table and on each game page.
